I'm not complaining, but I'm just stating the fact that 2011 hasn't been a very productive year. Oh, I've produced things. I pulled off my first academic presentation and am still awaiting word of what could be a huge publication score. I have things coming down the pike in the next couple of months. But you know, I think part of my damage is that for a couple of years now, I've been writing "made-to-order" stuff. I think I need to write something for me. But what?
I don't know a lot about the Brill Building. I have a sense about its place in musical history. I have a vague notion of what they talk about when they talk about the "Brill Building Sound" (and of the controversy behind that term). I kinda know some of the big names involved.
But here's the thing: I know is that it's the place where I want to set my next short story.
Showing posts with label work in progress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label work in progress. Show all posts
10 October 2011
29 September 2010
"God give us the blood to keep going"

This story's for a closed anthology, and it's due in about a month. Time to get cracking again! So after doing another round of hack-and-slash copyedits, I decided the piece needed a soundtrack. So I picked some songs to mirror the sort of mood evoked from the picture above, and a couple of songs for different characters' motivations.
Take a listen:
- Chicago, "Prologue, August 29, 1968"
- --, "Someday (August 29, 1968)
- --, "While the City Sleeps"
- --, "State of the Union"
- --, "Dialogue (Pt. 1 & 2)"
- --, "All the Years"
- Depeche Mode, "Walking in My Shoes"
- Antibalas Afrobeat Orchestra, "Battle of the Species"
- Manic Street Preachers, "If You Tolerate This, Your Children Will Be Next"
- Naomi Shelton & the Gospel Queens, "I'll Take the Long Road"
- Sons of Champlin, "Light Up the Candles"
Filed under:
music,
navel gazing,
work in progress
24 August 2010
"...going back to my old school."
I never did buy into the whole "shit happens when Mercury is in retrograde" thing, but today I came close.
Lots of stuff actually did go wrong today, but it started off badly from the jump. I get up, get out of the house, and make it to my morning writing spot with a good hour and fifteen minutes before work. And my beloved netbook, which worked fine before I left my place, refused to turn on. I heard the hard drive doing... something... whenever I hit the power button. But it just refused to boot up.
This is the point where, in the past, I would've gone off in a rage. Actually, I'm not sure why I didn't. Still, I had a few options. I had a similar problem sometime last year, which I fixed by flashing the BIOS. I had a "rescue USB" drive with me, but I'd forgotten how to use it. I could've gone back home, gotten online, and looked up how to fix what I thought was the problem--which would've eaten up my writing time--or, I could just take it back old school with an ancient method known as "longhand." And, that's what I did.
Because, that's how writers do it. With a red-eye and no fucking excuses.
Lots of stuff actually did go wrong today, but it started off badly from the jump. I get up, get out of the house, and make it to my morning writing spot with a good hour and fifteen minutes before work. And my beloved netbook, which worked fine before I left my place, refused to turn on. I heard the hard drive doing... something... whenever I hit the power button. But it just refused to boot up.
This is the point where, in the past, I would've gone off in a rage. Actually, I'm not sure why I didn't. Still, I had a few options. I had a similar problem sometime last year, which I fixed by flashing the BIOS. I had a "rescue USB" drive with me, but I'd forgotten how to use it. I could've gone back home, gotten online, and looked up how to fix what I thought was the problem--which would've eaten up my writing time--or, I could just take it back old school with an ancient method known as "longhand." And, that's what I did.
Because, that's how writers do it. With a red-eye and no fucking excuses.
Filed under:
navel gazing,
work in progress,
writing
17 August 2010
"For the love of a(n Elder) God, you say, Not a letter from an occupant"
It's one thing to take my roller derby nom-de-guerre from H.P. Lovecraft without having read any Lovecraft. But trying to write a story based on the mythos without doing so could end up making me look like an asshat.
The story I'm writing concerns a tidbit I happened to read about The Deep Ones. No, I'm not gonna tell you which tidbit--that'd spoil the story.
The story I'm writing concerns a tidbit I happened to read about The Deep Ones. No, I'm not gonna tell you which tidbit--that'd spoil the story.
Filed under:
navel gazing,
reading,
work in progress
15 August 2010
"Their features are changing. Their bodies dissolve, and I am alone"
My current short story in progress is headed (Elder Gods willing) to Cthulhurotica - An Anthology of Lovecraftian Lust, which will be published by Dagan Books. I worked out its soundtrack, just like I do for most of my stories, to help me figure out which emotional pulses I want to hit in different scenes.
Take a listen:
Take a listen:
- The New Pornographers, "Failsafe"
- Eleni Mandell, "Bigger Burn"
- Manic Street Preachers, "Your Love Alone Is Not Enough"
- Arcade Fire, "Ocean of Noise"
- Air, "The Word 'Hurricane'"
- Cassandra Wilson, "A Little Warm Death"
- The Blue Nile, "Body and Soul"
- Genesis, "Domino, Pt. 1 - In the Glow of the Night/Pt. 2 - The Last Domino"
Filed under:
music,
navel gazing,
video,
work in progress
18 June 2010
"What's my name, fool?"
I should apologize for the ratio of roller derby posts to writing posts lately, but you'll probably see that ratio continue to skew just a little bit more in the coming days.
Last night at a scrimmage, I had a crash course in the art of penalty-box timekeeping, making me a Non-Skating Official (NSO) in my local derby league. My first bout will be in two weeks. Unfortunately, I'm out most of July, what with Readercon and the "annual camping trip"* with friends. But I'll be around for their bouts in August and beyond.
The only thing missing, they tell me, is my roller derby name. So, I'm taking suggestions. Tell me something good in the comments. Or if you're one of my tweeps, you know where to find me.
Last night at a scrimmage, I had a crash course in the art of penalty-box timekeeping, making me a Non-Skating Official (NSO) in my local derby league. My first bout will be in two weeks. Unfortunately, I'm out most of July, what with Readercon and the "annual camping trip"* with friends. But I'll be around for their bouts in August and beyond.
The only thing missing, they tell me, is my roller derby name. So, I'm taking suggestions. Tell me something good in the comments. Or if you're one of my tweeps, you know where to find me.
Filed under:
derby,
work in progress,
wrojo
29 May 2010
Tough Love
I didn't post last Sunday's critique group evisceration due to sheer exhaustion. But the hardest two weeks of the academic year are behind me at the dayjob. I took an extra day off for the holiday weekend and I pretty much wasted yesterday (on purpose). So, I figure looking at these crits would be a good way for me to get back into writing today as I (try to) keep live audio and video feeds of Roland Garros in the background.
It occurs to me now that I've only looked at the story once or twice since then. I was temporarily seduced by a couple of flash fiction projects, one for a prompt on Zoetrope, and the other by a Twitter joke gone too far, with further yet to go.
Anyway, I brought the next bit of the short story I brought last crit group session, which is for a seekrit project. The group read the first part of the second act. With scalpels and machetes out, here's what they said.
It occurs to me now that I've only looked at the story once or twice since then. I was temporarily seduced by a couple of flash fiction projects, one for a prompt on Zoetrope, and the other by a Twitter joke gone too far, with further yet to go.
Anyway, I brought the next bit of the short story I brought last crit group session, which is for a seekrit project. The group read the first part of the second act. With scalpels and machetes out, here's what they said.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
17 May 2010
Tough Love
It's been over two months since my last confession piece was eviscerated by the critique group. Almost forgot what it was like. Luckily, I picked it up again pretty darn fast!
I'm writing and submitting, even got two publications in so far. I've also trunked two longer writing projects this year that just weren't working for me. I hate doing that because it means violating Robert Heinlein's #2 Rule for Writing: You must finish what you write. But I was prompted to start a new story by--well, I can't tell you why, not yet. It's a seekrit. Suffice it to say that this is the first time in a long time I was so excited by an idea. In one morning, I had a rough plot outline of all the major points I want to hit. By lunchtime, I had a title. I almost never have a title until the end.
I spit out Act I in time to submit it for vivisection by the critique group. And, vivisect it they did!
I'm writing and submitting, even got two publications in so far. I've also trunked two longer writing projects this year that just weren't working for me. I hate doing that because it means violating Robert Heinlein's #2 Rule for Writing: You must finish what you write. But I was prompted to start a new story by--well, I can't tell you why, not yet. It's a seekrit. Suffice it to say that this is the first time in a long time I was so excited by an idea. In one morning, I had a rough plot outline of all the major points I want to hit. By lunchtime, I had a title. I almost never have a title until the end.
I spit out Act I in time to submit it for vivisection by the critique group. And, vivisect it they did!
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
01 February 2010
Tough Love
Wow, last week was a shitty one for writing. I'm not making excuses. Just stating the plain fact that between the crazy shit going on at my dayjob and life in general, I just couldn't pull the end of this story together like I'd planned. Of course, being fixated on the Australian Open didn't help, either. What can I say, I'm a sucker for Grand Slam tennis, plus it was my escape from dayjob hell.
I did manage to pull together Act II of my story, and that's what I brought to the biweekly crit group vivisection yesterday. Here's what they said:
For the Win
I did manage to pull together Act II of my story, and that's what I brought to the biweekly crit group vivisection yesterday. Here's what they said:
For the Win
- This section was "intriguing." (I get that a lot these days)
- Good character details: e.g. being a member of MUFON; scene on the train ride in; what she wears to work
- Apparently, the way I wrote a section showing "The Battle of the Moon" was 95% win, in terms of its description and most of the details of how my protagonist came upon it.
- Good question on one reader's part: I never described wtf MUFON was.
- I ended Act II with a confusing situation. Out of seven readers, only one verbalized what was going on, and even that was only a guess on his part.
- One thing I apparently failed to fix from the last section I brought, my character still isn't showing enough of her alleged skepticism. She's still taking what's told to her at face value.
- The 5% of "Battle of the Moon" fail had to do with exactly how the MC stumbled onto it.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
17 January 2010
Tough Love
It's been way too long since I've had an example of my critique group's biweekly vivisection of my writing (Holy shit--August? Really, Don?). If you'll recall, the latter portion of 2009 was spent rewriting. But, one of my 2010 goals is to write a story a month, so I had to have something to bring this time around.
I brought Act I of the story that I hope will make people dance for me.
Here's what the group had to say...
For the Win
There's a first time for everything, huh? :)
I brought Act I of the story that I hope will make people dance for me.
Here's what the group had to say...
For the Win
- One reader was drawn to the main character. She "loved her voice."
- Another liked the description of the internet communications between the main character and the supporting character--an alien.
- A few readers liked the opening hook, which let them know what kind of story this was, and more importantly, what kind of story it wasn't.
- One commented on the "pop culture/sci-fi mix" I worked into the story. cf. the film Contact, except for the immediacy of the meeting between human and alien in my story.
- Everyone thought one aspect of the story--which I'll keep secret for now--was a really good device.
- Overall, the story was called "fun" and most of my descriptions "good."
- The main character had a bit of skepticism in her, which she should've shown during her first alien encounter...
- In particular, one piece of evidence I invented for the alien to convince the MC that he was an alien wasn't all that convincing (this is why I hate writing sci-fi ;)).
- One reader had a different opinion of the way I wrote the initial internet communication between the MC and the alien (emails and chats). He saw what I was trying to do stylistically, but wondered why I just didn't write the emails like emails, and the chats like straight up chats.
- My description of the alien, while generally clear--except for the alien's clothes--raised questions as to certain mechanics (especially regarding the aspect of it I need to keep secret right now :)).
- There were some beats missing in the last scene of Act I--readers questioned the way things escalated between the MC and the alien.
There's a first time for everything, huh? :)
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
04 January 2010
Any Given Sunday
I was drunk enough to agree, but not drunk enough to deny remembering I agree. Leave it to Mercedes to strike at exactly the right time! She wanted a throw down with the loser to re-enact one of my fantasies: to be Jesus, serenaded by Yvonne Elliman, complete with jazz hands:
But that wasn't enough. Oh, no. The more, the merrier, we said, so we invited Harley and Jason.
Yes, we Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are going to be engaged in mortal combat, with a theme chosen by a neutral party, one Boudreau Freret.
The Theme: A sci-fi/fantasy short story describing, "The first contact of two species with a mutual attraction betwixt them."
Story Deadline: We have until February 1, 2010 to come up with an original story based on the theme, to be simultaneously submitted to a SFWA-approved market.
The Stakes: First person to be published in the chosen market wins.
The losers will video themselves performing a song of the winner's choice ("Everything's Alright" in my case), complete with jazz hands!!
These are all worthy adversaries. I don't underestimate a single one of them. I've read their words. We're all at various stages of our writing careers, and yet a contest like this--well hell, a lot of publishing in general--has an "any given Sunday" feel to it. It could very well be me on video, jazz-handing along to someone else's tune.
This is going to be a first. I've never written to avoid humiliation before! :)
###
Edited to add: Harley's and Mercedes' understandably skewed opinions on the matter.
But that wasn't enough. Oh, no. The more, the merrier, we said, so we invited Harley and Jason.
Yes, we Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are going to be engaged in mortal combat, with a theme chosen by a neutral party, one Boudreau Freret.
The Theme: A sci-fi/fantasy short story describing, "The first contact of two species with a mutual attraction betwixt them."
Story Deadline: We have until February 1, 2010 to come up with an original story based on the theme, to be simultaneously submitted to a SFWA-approved market.
The Stakes: First person to be published in the chosen market wins.
The losers will video themselves performing a song of the winner's choice ("Everything's Alright" in my case), complete with jazz hands!!
These are all worthy adversaries. I don't underestimate a single one of them. I've read their words. We're all at various stages of our writing careers, and yet a contest like this--well hell, a lot of publishing in general--has an "any given Sunday" feel to it. It could very well be me on video, jazz-handing along to someone else's tune.
This is going to be a first. I've never written to avoid humiliation before! :)
###
Edited to add: Harley's and Mercedes' understandably skewed opinions on the matter.
Filed under:
name dropping,
navel gazing,
work in progress
05 October 2009
Catching Up is Hard to Do
I've decided that part of the problems I've been having with writing have to do with all the stuff swimming in my psychic RAM that needs to be dumped out. So many blogworthy things going on; so little time to blog them. So, here goes.
1
Just 'cos there haven't been my usual Tough Love posts doesn't mean that I haven't been attending the biweekly evisceration. I just haven't had anything to be eviscerated, not by the group, anyway.
2
I'm eviscerating my current short story in-progress, formerly titled "The Six-Hundred Dollar Man." With every section of prose I clean up, I feel like I'm butting my head trying to stick to the story I want to tell.
You may be thinking, "Maybe it's not the story that needs to be told." Except I know in my gut it is.
3
And aside from that, I've got 3 other stories that I need to finish revising and send off.
4
I entered The First Annual Brain Harvest Mega Challenge a little while back. The Second Place Winner has been posted. And I have to say, if that's second place, I think I'm pretty sure I didn't make First Place. :(
5
Last Friday & Saturday, I attended the 2009 Rod Serling Conference. I'm still processing the experience, a weekend filled with scholars, fans, and artists including Serling's surviving fammily and the legendary George Clayton Johnson on whose every word we hung.
A modern-day John the Baptist, if I ever saw one.

I'll blog the blow-by-blow later.
6
And now that I've taken time out to process my inbasket and tickler files, I can get some sleep and hit the WIP tomorrow.
1
Just 'cos there haven't been my usual Tough Love posts doesn't mean that I haven't been attending the biweekly evisceration. I just haven't had anything to be eviscerated, not by the group, anyway.
2
I'm eviscerating my current short story in-progress, formerly titled "The Six-Hundred Dollar Man." With every section of prose I clean up, I feel like I'm butting my head trying to stick to the story I want to tell.
You may be thinking, "Maybe it's not the story that needs to be told." Except I know in my gut it is.
3
And aside from that, I've got 3 other stories that I need to finish revising and send off.
4
I entered The First Annual Brain Harvest Mega Challenge a little while back. The Second Place Winner has been posted. And I have to say, if that's second place, I think I'm pretty sure I didn't make First Place. :(
5
Last Friday & Saturday, I attended the 2009 Rod Serling Conference. I'm still processing the experience, a weekend filled with scholars, fans, and artists including Serling's surviving fammily and the legendary George Clayton Johnson on whose every word we hung.
A modern-day John the Baptist, if I ever saw one.
I'll blog the blow-by-blow later.
6
And now that I've taken time out to process my inbasket and tickler files, I can get some sleep and hit the WIP tomorrow.
Filed under:
crit group,
name dropping,
navel gazing,
wasting time,
work in progress
24 August 2009
Tough Love
Finally finished the work in progress and brought the ending to the biweekly abatoir that is my critique group.
Remember the last few times when the Win list was longer than the Fail list? Not this time, but that's okay. It's called a "puke draft" for a reason. Not only that, I brought about 3 times as many words as I'd brought before--of course the Fail list was going to be longer!
For the Win
I've got a good feeling about this story though. I know all the pieces are there, even if they're in a jumble.
Remember the last few times when the Win list was longer than the Fail list? Not this time, but that's okay. It's called a "puke draft" for a reason. Not only that, I brought about 3 times as many words as I'd brought before--of course the Fail list was going to be longer!
For the Win
- Folks liked my description of the painful way the protagonist "solved" his problem.
- Those scenes had a "feeling of menace and chaos."
- Praise for how I cashed in on a couple of plot points from the beginning of the story. (It's funny--I had no idea I was gonna do that.)
- The usual praise about dialogue, prose, etc.
- Unresolved question #1: What are the stakes? (Yikes!)
- Other unresolved questions:
- What exactly is the protagonist's motivation for getting involved in this "strange, new world" in the first place?
- Why does he choose such a drastic solution to an unclear problem?
- In fact, isn't he making matters worse?
- What's his sister's motivation, 'cos the way she pushes the protagonist and where she pushes him to makes her look like more of a bad guy than the bad guy?
- What did the bad guy want that was so bad?
- I definitely strayed from the idea of "cultural tension" that I started out with in the beginning.
I've got a good feeling about this story though. I know all the pieces are there, even if they're in a jumble.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
27 July 2009
Tough Love
I low-balled my wordcount for yesterday's critique group crucifixion session again. 820 words. Just couldn't get the story done, but I did bring something. Better to light an inch than curse the darkness after all, no?
I took bits of the next scene I'd planned and decided to staple it to the end of the scene I brought last time. An obvious decision that you just don't see when you're in the midst of a puke draft. Comments were as follows...
Story Win
I took bits of the next scene I'd planned and decided to staple it to the end of the scene I brought last time. An obvious decision that you just don't see when you're in the midst of a puke draft. Comments were as follows...
Story Win
- I was a little clearer about the way the tech in this story works.
- Tension was raised
- Like last week, readers like the interaction between the protagonist and his sister.
- I painted a clear picture of the protagonist being a little foolhardy, yet barreling ahead anyway.
- Hm...I made a note of "Not a lot of words," but I've forgotten what that meant...?
- Anything involving the color green and computer coding will always say The Matrix.
- [I'm paraphrasing here] The form of the tech in my story, as I describe it, doesn't follow the function I describe. Or at least, I'm overcomplicating it.
- [Edited to add] I evidently don't know how to spell the singular of lenses.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
13 July 2009
Tough Love
Yesterday's biweekly critique group evisceration was more like a knuckle-rapping, since I was only able to bring the very next scene of my WIP, about 750 words long. So, it doesn't make sense for this entry to be very long :).
For the Win:
For the Win:
- Did a good job portraying the protagonist's squeamishness at the DIY operation he was undergoing.
- Did a good job portraying the sibling relationship between the protag and his sister.
- A minor plot point that demonstrated my poor understanding of chemistry :(
- A couple of viewpoint errors
- Still not enough information for the (group) readers' tastes about what the protag is after. (It was 95% clear to the "tech guy" in our group, but after all, he's a "tech guy.")
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
04 May 2009
Tough Love
I didn't read at the last crit group-flogging, but made up for it this time with two flash fiction pieces. I finally had the guts to try and combine some flash fic with a bit of fantasy. Did it work? Here's what the group had to say.
Story #1, 100 words:
For the Win:
For the Win:
Still, this'll probably be the last pieces I bring for the next few sessions. It's a new subs period for quite a few mags, and now I've got a nice little pile of stories to revise and submit! Because there have been precious few scorecard entries this year, and that makes me sad.
Story #1, 100 words:
For the Win:
- It was a "complete story."
- "Every word counts."
- Good "rhythm" to the sentences.
- Plot/fantasy element was clearly understood, depending on the reader's interpretation.
- In a session where the nit of the day seemed to be repeated words, the fact that I purposely repeated one particular phrase still worked.
- More than one reader wanted, well, more.
- One reader noted the story title's original connotation that has nothing to do with the story.
- My last sentence needlessly made my usually-ambiguous ending even more ambiguous by being too long.
For the Win:
- One reader immediately picked up on the meta-fiction aspect of the story!!
- "Weird, but believable."
- Good "characterization" i.e. the way I played around with stereotypical epic fantasy adventure characters.
- Same thing about "adventure cliches"
- "Twisty phrases"
- A "satisfying" (read: unambiguous) ending.
- Definitely went a little overboard trying not to make my sentences Carver-esque. Some of the them were too long. One reader made a comment about the sentence-length being good for an exercise, but not necessarily for this particular story.
- ...which makes some of the good "twisty phrases" a little too twisty.
Still, this'll probably be the last pieces I bring for the next few sessions. It's a new subs period for quite a few mags, and now I've got a nice little pile of stories to revise and submit! Because there have been precious few scorecard entries this year, and that makes me sad.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
05 April 2009
Tough Love
It's been a week since the last critique group and I'm only getting around to this now. That's the problem with this time of year for me, but that's okay--better to light an inch than curse the darkness, right?
I'm posting this for the sake of completeness (to contrast my failure to keep my scorecards up to date for the past few months).
There really isn't enough to break down into lists of Win! and Fail! because all I brought to last group--all I could bring, given the life BS I had to contend with that week--were two rewritten scenes. I brought them looking for only two things: (a) to see whether I successfully clarified/improved on the story's McGuffin (Group verdict: Win!) and (b) whether I could answer the question of what keeps the protagonist in the situation he's in (Group verdict: A little bit o' Fail!).
So, I guess I should go and do something with these suggestions now, huh?
I'm posting this for the sake of completeness (to contrast my failure to keep my scorecards up to date for the past few months).
There really isn't enough to break down into lists of Win! and Fail! because all I brought to last group--all I could bring, given the life BS I had to contend with that week--were two rewritten scenes. I brought them looking for only two things: (a) to see whether I successfully clarified/improved on the story's McGuffin (Group verdict: Win!) and (b) whether I could answer the question of what keeps the protagonist in the situation he's in (Group verdict: A little bit o' Fail!).
So, I guess I should go and do something with these suggestions now, huh?
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
17 March 2009
Tough Love
No justifications, no explanations, no excuses, though I will offer that some of these things might have been answered if I brought in the amount of material I'd intended to bring in before Life Happened the week before.
(From lowest to highest degree)
Hindsight is 20/20, but I'm thinking the reason I forced myself to bring and read 830 words of fail was for the symbolic victory of having written despite the week's obstacles. Obviously, it didn't even qualify as a Pyrric victory. It might've been if I'd have been able to finish more of it--I actually had about 500 more words, but I just couldn't get them polished in time.
I think it's time to drag my Inner Drill Sergeant back out...

For now--possibly from now on--I won't be posting Il Buono, il brutto, il cattivo of what I brought. Every comment I got was either Scene!Win or Scene!Fail. And the Fail list is sooo much longer...
Scene!Win
Scene!Win
- Scene I brought was "believeable, in a weird way."
- The "usual" compliments (smooth writing, believable/snappy dialogue, etc.)
- Bits were "funny."
(From lowest to highest degree)
- "Soda" vs. "pop" (vs. "coke")
- Need to give a little better sense of exactly who the protagonist, by this point.
- Need to be more explicit about the protagonist's feelings toward his overall situation.
- Need to show my protagonist's reactions to the fantasy element (good, bad, or indifferent).
- Confusion about how I described a facet of the fantasy element. (Totally unnecessary confusion, on my part.)
- The fucking scene doesn't really add anything, leaving some to still ask themselves exactly what the fucking story's really about!!
Hindsight is 20/20, but I'm thinking the reason I forced myself to bring and read 830 words of fail was for the symbolic victory of having written despite the week's obstacles. Obviously, it didn't even qualify as a Pyrric victory. It might've been if I'd have been able to finish more of it--I actually had about 500 more words, but I just couldn't get them polished in time.
I think it's time to drag my Inner Drill Sergeant back out...

Filed under:
crit group,
navel gazing,
war face,
work in progress
02 February 2009
Tough Love
So, some of my 2009 writing goals are off to a really fucking bad start. Life and death sometimes get in the way of writing, which is fine. But the good news is, I've thus far managed to keep my goal of writing one story a month, even though part of me thinks a 1,400-word story feels like cheating somehow, compared to last month's 3,000 words. Then again, February is shorter.
Anyway, I finished and polished the bulk of this short-short story the night before yesterday's critique group while watching the director's cut of THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY on AMC at 2:00 AM. Hence, the many problems spotted by the eagle-eyed writers in my biweekly crucifixion session.
The Good
Anyway, I finished and polished the bulk of this short-short story the night before yesterday's critique group while watching the director's cut of THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY on AMC at 2:00 AM. Hence, the many problems spotted by the eagle-eyed writers in my biweekly crucifixion session.
The Good
- The "switch" i.e. the change of direction at the end of the story
- The rhythm of the writing in some spots
- One pop-culture reference spotted
- The main character's arc
- My second paragraph should've been my intro paragraph.
- The fantasy element, telepathy, needed a bit more definition/consistency for one person
- One paragraph on an ex-girlfriend mentioned only once (among other things) could be nixed.
- I never named the story's supporting character.
- My experiment with not using quotation marks for dialogue was a fail for one reader.
- A major plot point about what people think of the main character might've been a little negative when usually, the truth is that most people don't think about us nearly as much as we think they do.
- ...leading to the question of whether the main character is actually reading minds or seeing a reflection of his own POV.
- Another lively debate (like in the last group), this time about my use of the generic THE OFFICE/OFFICE SPACE/DILBERT cubicle-hell setting and how the protagonist's co-workers were all painted as mean and blackhearted in some cases. One person strongly felt it was "overused" while another felt it was "awesome."
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
18 January 2009
Tough Love
Time once again to process my latest batch of critiques from my biweekly crucifixion session that is my critique group. The points are pretty brief. The passages I read totaled a mere 1,025 words. The important thing is that I finally managed to write an ending to this last WIP, and as soon as I figure out which of these critiques to use and finish up some rewrites, I can put a wrap on this beast.
The Good
The Good
- This story (thanks to a revised intro) is now solidly and unequivocably involves a faerie--really an ex-faerie--which enabled me to emphasize her "faerie-ness" in ways people seemed to like.
- The end had a "convincing twist." One person used the words "O Henry-like," but I'm pretty sure it was meant in a positive way.
- There was suprise the ending was happy, even "sweet." Not my usual fare, it's true. (Note to self, next story should include some "extreme horror" elements.) ;)
- Folks liked my juxtaposition of worlds where the mundane world of people in a dead-end job mixes with the world of faeries.
- Some narrative problems describing some physical mechanics involving a truck poised on the edge of a bluff, a rope, and the best place to tie...well, I could say more, but I'd be giving away plot.
- I gave some (too) vague hints that the faerie in question had put herself in a LITTLE MERMAID-type situation. But folks needed/wanted more.
- Since I created a setting where the workaday world of grocery-store employees mixes with the world of faeries, some readers needed to know the extent to which the main characters' co-workers were aware of that particular reality. (I kinda, sorta addressed this in a rewrite no one's seen yet.)
- People wanted a little more about faerie mechanics in this little world I've set up, specifically where it relates to a plot point about faerie anatomy.
- There was some lively debate about the ending, the implications of which were strikingly clear to some who read it exactly as I intended, and strikingly unclear to others for whom questions were raised. I admit, I wasn't prepared for that.
Filed under:
crit group,
work in progress
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)